yan0c3t3
wózek dziecinny
Dołączył: 23 Maj 2011
Posty: 9
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/10
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Pią 6:10, 27 Maj 2011 Temat postu: low jordans How To Define Atheism |
|
|
How To Define Atheism,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
In this case, we look by what atheism actually is. It is remove that atheism isn't a belief, but a lack of belief. The believer is the one who demands a god exists. Atheism simply points to the reality that some people's belief systems don't embody a belief in a god.
Finally, I did ascertain an online glossary which has the emulating definition of atheism: "A lack of belief in the existence of God or gods." Amen!
Some atheists (a small minority) may think they tin "prove" the non-existence of gods. This, whatsoever, has naught to do with atheism, anymore than a belief in Vishnu at some god-believers shows that theism is a belief in Vishnu. Atheism is simply the stance that "you have not proved your case, therefore I don't believe in your god."
Contrary apt what many folk calculate and many dictionaries recommend, atheism is no a belief. It is simply the lack of belief in "God " or gods. Before beginning this treatise, I retarded several dictionaries. In the premier 1,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the meaning of atheism given was,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "The tenet or faith that there is no God." What nonsense!
The burden of testimony is properly aboard the person making a claim. The typical atheist makes no claim almost God, except that he doesn't deem. He has no obligation to prove non-existence. If I claim Mickey Mouse is the "supreme morale" that rules our universe, would you feel obligated to start assembly certify to prove me erroneous? And how could you anyhow? The ecology of these claims is that they are made in ways that make them not subject to any criteria of testify or proof.
Definitions are tricky. There is no official arbiter of the English language, and whether there were, he or she or they could make mistakes in any case. How do we judge what definition is best, then? We look at the reality which the word represents, and use a definition that best describes that reality. The fact that we disagree on the sequel doesn't invalidate the process or suggest that we absence to put absolute faith in some "authority" to prefer for us.
Bottom line? Atheism is not a belief, and a appropriate definition of atheism is simply not believing in gods.
Fortunately, not all dictionaries define atheism in the same path,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but many do make this mistake of equating a lack of belief with a belief in the inverse. Other definitions I found included,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "Disbelief in or disapproval of the existence of God or gods," and even "Godlessness; immorality." At fewest that the end of the day one is half right.
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
