 Wysłany: Wto 0:46, 08 Mar 2011 Temat postu: physicalism |
|
| ith the modern idea of objective knowledge. This is further developed in
Hegel. If Hegel is correctnot only is what we call “objectivity” a historical productbut there is no way to infer from what appears in conscious experi- ence that there is a supposedly mind-independent object outside it. Marx extends Hegel’s anthropological shift in suggesting that all science is finally human scienceor part of the sciences of man (B 164; III304). This approach turns modern positivism – which aims to “reduce” the human sci- ences to the hard sciencesand the latter to physics (physicalism) – on its head. The steady aim of positivism is to remove the human elementwhich is supposedly subjectivein order to leave only objective cognition. This sug- gests a distinction in kind bet louis vuittonween those sciences which are independent of human beings and those which centrally depend on them. Wilhelm Dilthey (1833–1911)for instancedrew an influential distinction between natural sciencesconcerned with explanationand human scienceswhich center on interpretation. If Marx is correctthis distinction holds only on a superfi- cial level. For on a deeper level there is no distinction between different ef- forts to know the world and ourselvesall of whyilai: nike high heels louis vuitton outlet http://www.public4you.fora.pl/my-talents,24/or-the-individualthe-groupor-the-speci,47437.html#84121 |
|
